Call for Papers

Null Findings in Biological Research

Submission deadline: Wednesday, 30 April 2025

The scientific method is a multi-step process aimed at understanding the world around us, and as scientists we are trained that following the “Observe -> Hypothesize -> Experiment -> Prove” method will ultimately lead to a better understanding of natural phenomena and a publication in a reputable journal. However, sometimes results do not support the experimental hypothesis, and instead support the null hypothesis. When this happens, it is important to reflect on the nature of the scientific process and remember that negative or nonsignificant data, i.e. validation of the null hypothesis or null findings, is an integral step in the pursuit of scientific understanding. These data should be embraced, but are more often shoved into a corner or scrapped to avoid ‘bucking the status quo’ or, more commonly, due to a perceived lack of interest. It is in our collective best interest to hold these null findings to the same standard and scrutiny that comes with publishing ‘positive’ data, as this contributes to a more transparent, collaborative, and efficient scientific process that ultimately advances our knowledge and drives meaningful progress in research.

Editor:

Loren Wold, PhD
The Ohio State University
United States

Co-Editors:

Peter-James Zushin, PhD
Stanford University
United States

Thomas Sanderson, PhD
University of Michigan
United States

Keywords: Null findings; Biological research; Negative results

Submission Guidelines/Instructions

Please refer to the Author Guidelines to prepare your manuscript. When submitting your manuscript, please answer the question: "Is this submission for a special issue?" by selecting the special issue title from the drop-down list.

Submit now